Quorn Meat Substitute Faces Lawsuit
Posted on Sep 18th 2009 2:00PM by Kristen Seymour![]() |
| Photo: Quron.us |
According to the Center for Science in the Public Interest, studies as early as 1977 showed adverse reactions, including nausea and vomiting, in about 10 percent of subjects who ate Quorn. A control group then, and another study in more recent years, found that number to be closer to 5 percent, but, CSPI says that's "still a higher percentage of people than that of those who reported allergies to shellfish, milk, peanuts or other common food allergens."
The product, which Quorn Foods markets as being related to mushrooms, is based on a fungus called Fusarium venenatum (venenatum is Latin for venomous). However, while the mushroom relation is true because they are both fungi, according to CSPI, the association is "as misleading as claiming that humans are related to jellyfish since they're both animals."
CSPI launched a website in 2002 called quorncomplaints.org, and over 1,400 British and American consumers have left criticisms.
The issue isn't so much that the product has been shown to cause allergic reactions -- it's that no warning is given on the package despite that knowledge that has CSPI up in arms. Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is aware of the frequency of reactions, it still says the main Quorn ingredient is "generally recognized as safe." Well, if you're "generally" OK with a 5 percent chance of nausea or vomiting, that sounds about right.
This isn't the first time CSPI's litigation department has taken on a well-known food brand for what they perceive to be inaccurate labeling. They've sued and worked with brands including Anheuser Busch, Frito-Lay, Kellogg, KFC, Kraft and Sara Lee to improve labeling, marketing and product formulation.
Don't let this scare you away from a vegetarian diet, though -- the ADA says going veg is good for you!
Have you ever eaten Quorn products? Tell us about it in the comments!
















