BMI - How Accurate Is it?
Categories: Diet & Weight Loss

We all know that calculating body mass index (BMI) can give a good indication of weight range (underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese), but just how good is that indication?
It turns out, depending on your race, it may not be so great.
It turns out, depending on your race, it may not be so great.
Consistent with earlier findings that have shown BMI to be inexact, authors from a recent study in the British Medical Journal of Nutrition found "that the number used to indicate weight category does not reflect the same amount of body fat for some races compared to others."
If not BMI, what should you use?
Researchers compared the effectiveness of BMI to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) determination of percentage body fat. Their findings?
"Right now non-Hispanic white women are not considered obese until they have a BMI of 30 or above. Based on our data for Hispanic women the number would be around 28," study co-author Molly Bray, associate professor of Pediatrics - Nutrition at the USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, said in a press release. "For African American women the number to cross is around 32." The results for men were similar.
OK, so where can you get a DXA evaluation?
"DXA would most likely not be available to most people," study co-author Andrew Jackson, professor of Health and Human Performance at the University of Houston, explains in an e-mail. "It would be possible in a medical setting, likely not in a doctor's office. It would more likely be available at a medical center."
So if BMI is out and DXA isn't widely available, what should you use?
Jackson considers DXA to be the gold standard compared with BMI, which is less accurate because weight is not partitioned into its fat and fat-free components. The next best option? A "skinfold [test] is more accurate than BMI," Jaskson says. "I suspect the use of DXA will grow, but I am not sure how readily access it will be. It will be used more for research and important measurement needs."
Recent Posts
- Can You Think Yourself Thin? (11/25/2009)
- Should BMI Trump GPA as a Graduation Requirement? (11/25/2009)
- The Biggest Loser: Suze Orman and the Obesity Money Pit (11/25/2009)
- Get Taylor Lautner's Twilight Abs (11/25/2009)
- Beyond Squats and Lunges: Part 1 (11/25/2009)
























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
BB 4-09-2009 @ 4:59PM
BMI is a joke it is obsolete and does not apply to people that are fit and heavy. I am 6'3 and 223 lbs my BMI is 27.9 almost obese? The number might mean something if it took in to account body fat % and fat weight, my most recent fat test was 2 weeks ago and a skin fold test put me at 13% I also have a 48" chest with a 34 inch waist. I am very fit I lift 5 days per week and do 5 cardio sesions a week How can my BMI show me at borderline obese??
Reply
Inge 4-09-2009 @ 7:23PM
BMI has its limitations but is certainly not useless.
For total health control I can recommend further exploration at http://www.ckbody.com as the "Portal to your Health"
Enjoy!
***********************
Reply
naima 4-26-2009 @ 1:38PM
I agree with the first commenter, BB. (BMI is certainly misleading, not only in terms of race but tribal differences--particularly in a population as pluralistic as the United States. Although I grew up in the U.S., for years I had the typical fat to muscle/bone density ratio for members of my father's tribe in West Africa--"lean, mean & muscle to bone"--I was always being referred to as skinny (later thin, despite my obvious bone density & muscle, in my adult years) even though I had always been strong, not a weakling, & from as early as the age of ten, could lift at least 15 pounds in excess of my own body weight, effortlessly. I was a sprinter and sprint cyclist for years & had excellent lung power from years of chopping wood/hauling, lifting, stooping/bending daily year round often in hot, humid temperatures of up to 100 degrees, and later walking up to five hours a day for a period of about five years. Perhaps, in terms of fat percentage, I thin, but that is deceiving, generally weighed more than most of my American peers who appeared to be of the same size visually and in clothing size. At 24, I took a BMI, with a total wgt. of 138 lbs., 118 lbs. was skeletal weight, 9.75% was body fat (a figure which, if stated on its own, usually elicited comments about how I was under the minimum for women). Which group of women? It was just that I was of a West African body-type, one generation removed. I was told I had excellent lung power, which I already knew; my heart rate was above average, and blood pressure were ideal for all aerobic sports. Like most tests & test results, the BMI is Eurocentric--catering to a particular ethnic group & most probably a particularly class--of women & is therefore misleading much of the time. Even though I had no ribs showing, had considerable definition to my physique from years of chopping wood, etc. & being a cyclist, women who were clearly just skin & bone, with little fat on them were regularly calling me skinny. Oftentimes, before it was in vogue for women to have biceps or strong quads or hamstrings--unless they were professional athletes or professional dancers--there seemed to be an obssession with my physique. And overweight women, clearly in need of a gym or truly obese had a field day. Fit & perfectly healthy people, physically capable & strong have been being tyrannized by fat, overweight, lazy people (often on one diet or another) for years. Now they're appropriating tests like the BMI to further confound & confuse the issue. I am glad to see that a discussion questioning the veracity of the BMI tests has begun, so that maybe someday this tyranny of women who are naturally thin, or whose weight is genetically (or ethnically) comprised of bone dense and muscle with naturally low body fat. There are even regional differences, right here in the States, which I didn't realize until I left the eastern seaboard for the midwest, where there were large communities of tall & lean Scandinavians, not the typical English, Irish, Italian, Eastern European and Asian body types that I had grown accustomed to seeing in the Northeast. For me, having grown up in an area of the country in the South, where it was not uncommon for women to proudly carry 35lbs. (or more) in excess weight, while extolling its virtues, when I met the spear side of my family, it answered a lot of questions.
Reply
Laurel Yvonne 5-19-2009 @ 11:39PM
BMI is a usesful indicator in clinical settings to estimate degree of malnutrition.
Also, a person with a higher BMI has more body mass, regardless if it is fat or muscle, and therefore more nutrients to break down in periods of hypermetabolic activity; and therefore, can survive hypocaloric feedings or several days without food if complete bowel rest is necessary or hemodynamic stability cannot be achieved.
But agreed, for the general population, BMI is not the best assessment of weight status.