Check out our Diet Reviews on AOL Health!

Fitness is Stupid

Categories: Fitness


Liz Neporent is a diet and fitness expert and author of 12 fitness bestsellers. She regularly appears on national TV programs and is the president of Wellness 360, a New-York based wellness provider.

I was at the gym the other day and watched as a trainer placed his client in front of a large ball and then had her balance one foot on top of the ball while holding a bar up over her head and dipping down into a lunge. As she struggled mightily to prevent a chain reaction of the ball rolling away, falling flat on her face and becoming the object of ridicule by all who watched, the trainer was oblivious. He was blah-blahing away about how this exercise was so "functional" and how important it is for movement to be functional and how functional is so much better than non-functional and functional, functional, functional ...

Just then it hit me why so many people are turned off by exercise.

The fitness industry -- everyone from the trainers to the gym operators to the equipment designers -- have made exercise too damn hard! At a time when Americans are desperately searching for simple solutions to the tight pants epidemic, we "experts" have made getting into shape so complicated and impossible to understand, most people have given up. Exercise has evolved from "feel the burn" to "just do it" to what it is now: functional, computerized, periodized and jargonized. We used to lift, run and stretch. Now we use articulating arms, independent resistance and metabolically-adjusted pacing.

Honestly, all most people want is a firmer tushy and a flatter tummy -- not an eccentrically-trained gluteus maximus or a kinesthetically-ideal rectus abdominus. You should be able to sit on a machine and figure it out just by looking at it and get what a movement is all about from one basic, straightforward sentence. (I once overheard a trainer tell her client "elevate up onto your phalanges" which is a $1,200 way of saying "get on your tippy toes." Oh man, shut up, right?)

Good exercise practices are absolutely based on sound science. Just not pseudo gym science. In the end, if you can understand it, you'll be more likely to stick with it and achieve your goals. This is why Richard Simmons is a genius. It's why gyms like Curves are packed. And, quite frankly, it's why the Fitness and Weight Training for Dummies books I wrote with my co-author Suzanne Schlossberg have sold millions of copies. All of these honor the Keep It Simple Stupid (KISS) principle, whereas most of the rest of what's offered today in the fitness world just gets more and more complicated.

What say you fellow fitness bloggers?

  • In gym science terms, the word functional means something that translates into real life skills like better balance, or ab muscles that stay strong when you bend down to pick up a book.
  • And anyway -- what is so "functional" about the ball lunges that trainer had his client doing? Maybe if she were preparing to run a marathon during an earthquake or she happens to live on a tilt-a-whirl ... otherwise, that exercise is about as functional as the torn knee ligaments likely to result from doing movements like this. I don't dispute that a certain amount of functional exercise can be useful. I'm simply saying that exercises which are often labeled as such have become so, um, recklessly creative that they are no longer sane.

Recent Posts

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Recent Comments
Featured Writers
Bob GreeneReggie Casagrande
Bob Greene
Jonny BowdenJohn GanonJonny Bowden

Tanya ZuckerbrotFadil BerishaTanya Zuckerbrot
Liz Neporent Liz Neporent