Drug tests for scholars?

Huh? Are these people saying that scholastic endeavors are an athletic competition and that a correct answer on a written test is incorrect if given by a student who is "medicated"? Will the student forget what was learned once he/she is off of the offending substance?
What is the exact definition of "unfair advantage" and HOW is it unfair??? WHY is it unfair??? How or what is the advantage in the first place? While it's true the substances might have some sort of physical affect the line of reasoning concerning classroom test taking doesn't make sense? Or are some poorly performing students going to be "poor babied" because they didn't get as good a grade as someone else who has learned things more completely or in keeping with the testing process.
It's the studying and learning that produces the correct answers, not the drugs themselves. Sounds like sour grapes time in the making.

reply