Second-hand smoke not dangerous? Think again
Categories: Diet & Weight Loss
If you're a smoker, do yo subscribe to the belief that second-hand smoke causes no damage when inhaled by non-smokers? While some smokers I know defend the position that there are no ill effects from second-hand smoke, I just don't buy it.Apparently, many researchers agree with me, as a recent round of research has added to the body of evidence that second-hand smoke is indeed dangerous, even in small amounts.
This new research showed that second-hard smoke can "can harm the function of the arteries in children," among other things. Adding to that, the inhalation of second-hand smoke was found to be "harmful to the cardiovascular system of healthy schoolchildren." What about adults who breathe in second-hand smoke? I would venture to guess the disadvantages are pretty much the same.
Recent Posts
- Heidi Klum Hits The Runway After Baby (11/20/2009)
- Thanksgiving Dinner Satisfaction And Perfect Portion Control: Time to Celebrate (11/20/2009)
- Cheesy Workout Video Round-up (11/20/2009)
- Kim Kardashian's Sexy Salad Commercial (11/20/2009)
- Simple Thanksgiving Swaps (11/20/2009)
























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
g baby 1-16-2009 @ 1:32AM
http://www.davehitt.com/facts/ this might change your mind. i read this after my biology teacher at UofL claimed that the results of the EPA's study were biased and invalid. remember not to blindly accept anything the govt. tells you is fact
Reply
Kadia 6-06-2007 @ 4:32AM
You don't need to venture to guess - just go to google scholar and type in 'second hand smoke' and you'll get pages and pages of peer-reviewed studies showing links between passive smoking and a plethora of health problems, along with studies showing that smoking bans in workplaces go some way to helping alleviate (not fix, of course) these problems.
Reply