Study finds brain bleeds in 25% of newborns
Categories: Diet & Weight Loss, Nutrition & Supplements
When I was pregnant with my first child, my OB wouldn't schedule an ultrasound after 5 weeks gestation. He said that as long as the baby and I appeared healthy, there wasn't any reason for it. With my second child, I had a different doctor who scheduled two or three throughout the pregnancy. The final ultrasound set off a flurry of tests and follow up ultrasounds when they thought there was something wrong with the baby's kidneys. Several ultrasounds later, I finally gave (normal, uncomplicated) birth to a healthy, happy child. None of those tests were necessary and in the end caused me more stress and worry than anything else. As my first doctor said, "Sometimes a little knowledge can be dangerous."
That's a very long story to explain to you how I feel about this story. I can see myself hovering over my firstborn, worrying over the umbilical cord. If I had known about brain bleeds, I probably wouldn't have been able to relax enough to enjoy the little sleep I got those first few weeks. Expectant mothers don't need more to worry over, we do enough of that already. Though I have no medical training and don't want to be glib about this finding, my instincts tell me that this is a normal side effect of birth and that the findings won't change anything in the long run about labor and delivery. Any moms or OBs out there interested in chiming in?
That's a very long story to explain to you how I feel about this story. I can see myself hovering over my firstborn, worrying over the umbilical cord. If I had known about brain bleeds, I probably wouldn't have been able to relax enough to enjoy the little sleep I got those first few weeks. Expectant mothers don't need more to worry over, we do enough of that already. Though I have no medical training and don't want to be glib about this finding, my instincts tell me that this is a normal side effect of birth and that the findings won't change anything in the long run about labor and delivery. Any moms or OBs out there interested in chiming in?
Recent Posts
- Can You Think Yourself Thin? (11/25/2009)
- Should BMI Trump GPA as a Graduation Requirement? (11/25/2009)
- The Biggest Loser: Suze Orman and the Obesity Money Pit (11/25/2009)
- Get Taylor Lautner's Twilight Abs (11/25/2009)
- Beyond Squats and Lunges: Part 1 (11/25/2009)
























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Kira 1-31-2007 @ 1:39PM
I find it very hard to take this too seriously. If several large scale studies back it up...well, I still might have trouble taking it seriously. It just doesn't make sense. If vaginal births were so dangerous, wouldn't we be endangered as a species?
Reply
Marcie 2-01-2007 @ 8:28PM
The article does not define what they mean by "natural" - does that mean vaginal or unmedicated or something else? Because all non-cesarean births would often include the use of forceps, vaccuums, and a mother pushing through an epidural that could likely be the cause of extended labor. I would be interested to see such a study on truly "natural" - unmedicated births.
Reply